Debian: DSA-3230-1: django-markupfield security update

    Date20 Apr 2015
    CategoryDebian
    62
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    James P. Turk discovered that the ReST renderer in django-markupfield, a custom Django field for easy use of markup in text fields, didn't disable the ..raw directive, allowing remote attackers to include arbitrary files.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3230-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Alessandro Ghedini
    April 20, 2015                         http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : django-markupfield
    CVE ID         : CVE-2015-0846
    
    James P. Turk discovered that the ReST renderer in django-markupfield,
    a custom Django field for easy use of markup in text fields, didn't
    disable the ..raw directive, allowing remote attackers to include
    arbitrary files.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.0.2-2+deb7u1.
    
    For the upcoming stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been
    fixed in version 1.2.1-2+deb8u1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.3.2-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your django-markupfield packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"9","type":"x","order":"3","pct":32.14,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.