Debian: DSA-3233-1: wpa security update

    Date24 Apr 2015
    CategoryDebian
    80
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    The Google security team and the smart hardware research group of Alibaba security team discovered a flaw in how wpa_supplicant used SSID information when creating or updating P2P peer entries. A remote attacker can use this flaw to cause wpa_supplicant to crash, expose
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3233-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                      Salvatore Bonaccorso
    April 24, 2015                         http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : wpa
    CVE ID         : CVE-2015-1863
    Debian Bug     : 783148
    
    The Google security team and the smart hardware research group of
    Alibaba security team discovered a flaw in how wpa_supplicant used SSID
    information when creating or updating P2P peer entries. A remote
    attacker can use this flaw to cause wpa_supplicant to crash, expose
    memory contents, and potentially execute arbitrary code.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.0-3+deb7u2. Note that this issue does not affect the binary
    packages distributed in Debian as the CONFIG_P2P is not enabled for
    the build.
    
    For the upcoming stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been
    fixed in version 2.3-1+deb8u1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.3-2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your wpa packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"6","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.55,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":27.27,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":18.18,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.