Debian: DSA-3327-1: squid3 security update

    Date03 Aug 2015
    CategoryDebian
    45
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Alex Rousskov of The Measurement Factory discovered that Squid3, a fully featured web proxy cache, does not correctly handle CONNECT method peer responses when configured with cache_peer and operating on explicit proxy traffic. This could allow remote clients to gain unrestricted
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3327-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    August 03, 2015                       https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : squid3
    CVE ID         : CVE-2015-5400
    Debian Bug     : 793128
    
    Alex Rousskov of The Measurement Factory discovered that Squid3, a fully
    featured web proxy cache, does not correctly handle CONNECT method peer
    responses when configured with cache_peer and operating on explicit
    proxy traffic. This could allow remote clients to gain unrestricted
    access through a gateway proxy to its backend proxy.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed
    in version 3.1.20-2.2+deb7u3.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.4.8-6+deb8u1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.5.6-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your squid3 packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you read our distribution advisories on a regular basis?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /component/communitypolls/?task=poll.vote&format=json
    23
    radio
    [{"id":"84","title":"Yes, for a single distribution","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"1","pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":"85","title":"Yes, for multiple distributions","votes":"6","type":"x","order":"2","pct":60,"resources":[]},{"id":"86","title":"No","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"3","pct":40,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.