Debian: DSA-3479-1: graphite2 security update

    Date15 Feb 2016
    CategoryDebian
    65
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in the Graphite font rendering engine which might result in denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code if a malformed font file is processed.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3479-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    February 15, 2016                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : graphite2
    CVE ID         : CVE-2016-1521 CVE-2016-1522 CVE-2016-1523
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in the Graphite font rendering
    engine which might result in denial of service or the execution of
    arbitrary code if a malformed font file is processed.
    
    
    For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed
    in version 1.3.5-1~deb7u1.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.3.5-1~deb8u1.
    
    For the testing distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed
    in version 1.3.5-1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.3.5-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your graphite2 packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"1","pct":55.56,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":33.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":11.11,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.