Debian: DSA-3485-2: didiwiki security update

    Date12 Apr 2016
    CategoryDebian
    43
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    The update for didiwiki issued as DSA-3485-1 introduced a regression that caused a large number of valid pages to not be accessible anymore. This occurred mostly for pages whose names started with non-ascii characters.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3485-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Sebastien Delafond
    April 12, 2016                        https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : didiwiki
    Debian Bug     : 818708
    
    The update for didiwiki issued as DSA-3485-1 introduced a regression
    that caused a large number of valid pages to not be accessible
    anymore. This occurred mostly for pages whose names started with
    non-ascii characters.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed
    in version 0.5-11+deb7u2.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.5-11+deb8u2.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.5-13.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your didiwiki packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"14","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.85,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":15.38,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"3","pct":30.77,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.