Debian: DSA-3499-1: pillow security update

    Date28 Feb 2016
    CategoryDebian
    69
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple security vulnerabilities have been found in Pillow, a Python imaging library, which may result in denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code if a malformed FLI, PCD or Tiff files is processed.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA256
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3499-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    February 28, 2016                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : pillow
    CVE ID         : CVE-2016-0740 CVE-2016-0775 CVE-2016-2533 
    
    Multiple security vulnerabilities have been found in Pillow, a Python
    imaging library, which may result in denial of service or the execution
    of arbitrary code if a malformed FLI, PCD or Tiff files is processed.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed
    in version 1.1.7-4+deb7u2 of the python-imaging source package.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.6.1-2+deb8u2.
    
    For the testing distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed
    in version 3.1.1-1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.1.1-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your pillow packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"39","type":"x","order":"1","pct":51.32,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"11","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.47,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"26","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.21,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.