Debian: DSA-3511-1: bind9 security update

    Date09 Mar 2016
    CategoryDebian
    34
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Two vulnerabilites have been discovered in ISC's BIND DNS server. CVE-2016-1285
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3511-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                          Michael Gilbert
    March 09, 2016                        https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : bind9
    CVE ID         : CVE-2016-1285 CVE-2016-1286
    
    Two vulnerabilites have been discovered in ISC's BIND DNS server.
    
    CVE-2016-1285
    
        A maliciously crafted rdnc, a way to remotely administer a BIND server,
        operation can cause named to crash, resulting in denial of service.
    
    CVE-2016-1286
    
        An error parsing DNAME resource records can cause named to crash,
        resulting in denial of service.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed
    in version 9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u10.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
    version 9.9.5.dfsg-9+deb8u6.
    
    For the testing (stretch) and unstable (sid) distributions, these
    problems will be fixed soon.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your bind9 packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you read our distribution advisories on a regular basis?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /component/communitypolls/?task=poll.vote&format=json
    23
    radio
    [{"id":"84","title":"Yes, for a single distribution","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"1","pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":"85","title":"Yes, for multiple distributions","votes":"6","type":"x","order":"2","pct":60,"resources":[]},{"id":"86","title":"No","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"3","pct":40,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.