Debian: DSA-3539-1: srtp security update

    Date 02 Apr 2016
    387
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Randell Jesup and the Firefox team discovered that srtp, Cisco's reference implementation of the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP), does not properly handle RTP header CSRC count and extension header length. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to crash
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3539-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    April 02, 2016                        https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : srtp
    CVE ID         : CVE-2015-6360
    Debian Bug     : 807698
    
    Randell Jesup and the Firefox team discovered that srtp, Cisco's
    reference implementation of the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol
    (SRTP), does not properly handle RTP header CSRC count and extension
    header length. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to crash
    an application linked against libsrtp, resulting in a denial of service.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed
    in version 1.4.4+20100615~dfsg-2+deb7u2.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.4.5~20130609~dfsg-1.1+deb8u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your srtp packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"1","pct":42.86,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":28.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.