Debian: DSA-3595-1: mariadb-10.0 security update

    Date 05 Jun 2016
    169
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Several issues have been discovered in the MariaDB database server. The vulnerabilities are addressed by upgrading MariaDB to the new upstream version 10.0.25. Please see the MariaDB 10.0 Release Notes for further details:
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3595-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    June 05, 2016                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : mariadb-10.0
    CVE ID         : CVE-2016-0640 CVE-2016-0641 CVE-2016-0643 CVE-2016-0644
                     CVE-2016-0646 CVE-2016-0647 CVE-2016-0648 CVE-2016-0649
                     CVE-2016-0650 CVE-2016-0655 CVE-2016-0666 CVE-2016-0668
    Debian Bug     : 823325
    
    Several issues have been discovered in the MariaDB database server. The
    vulnerabilities are addressed by upgrading MariaDB to the new upstream
    version 10.0.25. Please see the MariaDB 10.0 Release Notes for further
    details:
    
     https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/mariadb-10024-release-notes/
     https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/mariadb-10025-release-notes/
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
    version 10.0.25-0+deb8u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your mariadb-10.0 packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"1","pct":42.86,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":28.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.