Debian: DSA-3608-1: libreoffice security update

    Date29 Jun 2016
    CategoryDebian
    38
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Aleksandar Nikolic discovered that missing input sanitising in the RTF parser in Libreoffice may result in the execution of arbitrary code if a malformed documented is opened.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3608-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    June 29, 2016                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : libreoffice
    CVE ID         : CVE-2016-4324
    
    Aleksandar Nikolic discovered that missing input sanitising in the RTF
    parser in Libreoffice may result in the execution of arbitrary code if
    a malformed documented is opened.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1:4.3.3-2+deb8u5.
    
    For the testing distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed
    in version 1:5.1.4~rc1-1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1:5.1.4~rc1-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your libreoffice packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"9","type":"x","order":"3","pct":32.14,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.