Linux Security
    Linux Security
    Linux Security

    Debian: DSA-3644-1: fontconfig security update

    Date
    185
    Posted By
    Tobias Stoeckmann discovered that cache files are insufficiently validated in fontconfig, a generic font configuration library. An attacker can trigger arbitrary free() calls, which in turn allows double free attacks and therefore arbitrary code execution. In combination with
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3644-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    August 08, 2016                       https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : fontconfig
    CVE ID         : CVE-2016-5384
    Debian Bug     : 833570
    
    Tobias Stoeckmann discovered that cache files are insufficiently
    validated in fontconfig, a generic font configuration library. An
    attacker can trigger arbitrary free() calls, which in turn allows double
    free attacks and therefore arbitrary code execution. In combination with
    setuid binaries using crafted cache files, this could allow privilege
    escalation.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.11.0-6.3+deb8u1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.11.0-6.5.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your fontconfig packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    Advisories

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Tails is the most secure Linux distro out there.

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 2 answer(s).
    /main-polls/41-ubuntu-is-a-more-secure-distro-than-fedora?task=poll.vote&format=json
    41
    radio
    [{"id":"142","title":"Yes - Tails get my vote!","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"1","pct":80,"resources":[]},{"id":"143","title":"Nope - Parrot OS has surpassed Tails in its security and privacy.","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"2","pct":20,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350

    Please vote first in order to view vote results.


    VIEW MORE POLLS

    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.