Debian: DSA-3650-1: libgcrypt20 security update

    Date17 Aug 2016
    CategoryDebian
    49
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Felix Doerre and Vladimir Klebanov from the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology discovered a flaw in the mixing functions of Libgcrypt's random number generator. An attacker who obtains 4640 bits from the RNG can trivially predict the next 160 bits of output.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3650-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    August 17, 2016                       https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : libgcrypt20
    CVE ID         : CVE-2016-6313
    
    Felix Doerre and Vladimir Klebanov from the Karlsruhe Institute of
    Technology discovered a flaw in the mixing functions of Libgcrypt's
    random number generator. An attacker who obtains 4640 bits from the RNG
    can trivially predict the next 160 bits of output.
    
    A first analysis on the impact of this bug for GnuPG shows that existing
    RSA keys are not weakened. For DSA and Elgamal keys it is also unlikely
    that the private key can be predicted from other public information.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.6.3-2+deb8u2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your libgcrypt20 packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.35,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.78,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.