Debian: DSA-3675-1: imagemagick security update

    Date23 Sep 2016
    CategoryDebian
    46
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    This updates fixes several vulnerabilities in imagemagick: Various memory handling problems and cases of missing or incomplete input sanitising may result in denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code if malformed SIXEL, PDB, MAP, SGI, TIFF and CALS files are processed.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3675-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    September 23, 2016                    https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : imagemagick
    CVE ID         : not yet available
    Debian Bug     : 836776 836172 836171
    
    This updates fixes several vulnerabilities in imagemagick: Various memory
    handling problems and cases of missing or incomplete input sanitising
    may result in denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code if
    malformed SIXEL, PDB, MAP, SGI, TIFF and CALS files are processed.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
    version 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u5.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems will be fixed soon.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your imagemagick packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":21.43,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"3","pct":21.43,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.