Debian: DSA-3719-1: wireshark security update

    Date21 Nov 2016
    CategoryDebian
    41
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that wireshark, a network protocol analyzer, contained several vulnerabilities in the dissectors for DCERPC, AllJoyn, DTN, and OpenFlow, that could lead to various crashes, denial-of-service, or execution of arbitrary code.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3719-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Sebastien Delafond
    November 21, 2016                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : wireshark
    CVE ID         : CVE-2016-9373 CVE-2016-9374 CVE-2016-9375 CVE-2016-9376
    
    It was discovered that wireshark, a network protocol analyzer,
    contained several vulnerabilities in the dissectors for DCERPC,
    AllJoyn, DTN, and OpenFlow, that could lead to various crashes,
    denial-of-service, or execution of arbitrary code.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.12.1+g01b65bf-4+deb8u10.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 2.2.2+g9c5aae3-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your wireshark packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"1","pct":55.56,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":33.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":11.11,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.