Debian: DSA-3723-1: gst-plugins-good1.0 security update

    Date24 Nov 2016
    CategoryDebian
    57
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Chris Evans discovered that the GStreamer 1.0 plugin used to decode files in the FLIC format allowed execution of arbitrary code. Further details can be found in his advisory at https://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.de/2016/11/0day-exploit-advancing-exploitation.html
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3723-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    November 24, 2016                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : gst-plugins-good1.0
    CVE ID         : CVE-2016-9634 CVE-2016-9635 CVE-2016-9636
    Debian Bug     : 845375
    
    Chris Evans discovered that the GStreamer 1.0 plugin used to decode
    files in the FLIC format allowed execution of arbitrary code. Further
    details can be found in his advisory at
    https://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.de/2016/11/0day-exploit-advancing-exploitation.html
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.4.4-2+deb8u2.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.10.1-2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your gst-plugins-good1.0 packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"1","pct":62.5,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":25,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":12.5,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.