Debian: DSA-3778-1: ruby-archive-tar-minitar security update

    Date31 Jan 2017
    CategoryDebian
    110
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Michal Marek discovered that ruby-archive-tar-minitar, a Ruby library that provides the ability to deal with POSIX tar archive files, is prone to a directory traversal vulnerability. An attacker can take advantage of this flaw to overwrite arbitrary files during archive extraction via
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3778-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    January 31, 2017                      https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : ruby-archive-tar-minitar
    CVE ID         : CVE-2016-10173
    Debian Bug     : 853249
    
    Michal Marek discovered that ruby-archive-tar-minitar, a Ruby library
    that provides the ability to deal with POSIX tar archive files, is prone
    to a directory traversal vulnerability. An attacker can take advantage
    of this flaw to overwrite arbitrary files during archive extraction via
    a .. (dot dot) in an extracted filename.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.5.2-2+deb8u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your ruby-archive-tar-minitar packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"67","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.76,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":12.93,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"34","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.31,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.