Debian: DSA-3782-1: openjdk-7 security update

    Date08 Feb 2017
    CategoryDebian
    57
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in OpenJDK, an implementation of the Oracle Java platform, resulting in the bypass of Java sandbox restrictions, denial of service, arbitrary code execution, incorrect parsing or URLs/LDAP DNs or cryptoraphice timing side channel
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA256
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3782-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    February 08, 2017                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : openjdk-7
    CVE ID         : CVE-2016-5546 CVE-2016-5547 CVE-2016-5548 CVE-2016-5552 
                     CVE-2017-3231 CVE-2017-3241 CVE-2017-3252 CVE-2017-3253 
                     CVE-2017-3260 CVE-2017-3261 CVE-2017-3272 CVE-2017-3289
    
    Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in OpenJDK, an
    implementation of the Oracle Java platform, resulting in the bypass of
    Java sandbox restrictions, denial of service, arbitrary code execution,
    incorrect parsing or URLs/LDAP DNs or cryptoraphice timing side channel
    attacks.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
    version 7u121-2.6.8-2~deb8u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your openjdk-7 packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"14","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.85,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":15.38,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"3","pct":30.77,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.