Debian: DSA-3794-2: munin regression update

    Date02 Mar 2017
    CategoryDebian
    101
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    The update for munin issues as DSA-3794-1 caused a regression in the zooming functionality in munin-cgi-graph. Updated packages are now available to correct this issue. For reference, the original advisory text follows.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3794-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    March 02, 2017                        https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : munin
    Debian Bug     : 856455
    
    The update for munin issues as DSA-3794-1 caused a regression in the
    zooming functionality in munin-cgi-graph. Updated packages are now
    available to correct this issue. For reference, the original advisory
    text follows.
    
    Stevie Trujillo discovered a local file write vulnerability in munin, a
    network-wide graphing framework, when CGI graphs are enabled. GET
    parameters are not properly handled, allowing to inject options into
    munin-cgi-graph and overwriting any file accessible by the user running
    the cgi-process.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.0.25-1+deb8u2.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.0.32-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your munin packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"67","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.76,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":12.93,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"34","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.31,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.