Debian: DSA-3867-1: sudo security update

    Date30 May 2017
    CategoryDebian
    97
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    The Qualys Security team discovered that sudo, a program designed to provide limited super user privileges to specific users, does not properly parse "/proc/[pid]/stat" to read the device number of the tty from field 7 (tty_nr). A sudoers user can take advantage of this flaw on
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3867-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    May 30, 2017                          https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : sudo
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-1000367
    Debian Bug     : 863731
    
    The Qualys Security team discovered that sudo, a program designed to
    provide limited super user privileges to specific users, does not
    properly parse "/proc/[pid]/stat" to read the device number of the tty
    from field 7 (tty_nr). A sudoers user can take advantage of this flaw on
    an SELinux-enabled system to obtain full root privileges.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.8.10p3-1+deb8u4.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your sudo packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"24","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.55,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":11.36,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.09,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.