Debian: DSA-3890-1: spip security update

    Date21 Jun 2017
    CategoryDebian
    39
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Emeric Boit of ANSSI reported that SPIP, a website engine for publishing, insufficiently sanitises the value from the X-Forwarded-Host HTTP header field. An unauthenticated attacker can take advantage of this flaw to cause remote code execution.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3890-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    June 21, 2017                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : spip
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-9736
    Debian Bug     : 864921
    
    Emeric Boit of ANSSI reported that SPIP, a website engine for
    publishing, insufficiently sanitises the value from the X-Forwarded-Host
    HTTP header field. An unauthenticated attacker can take advantage of
    this flaw to cause remote code execution.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.1.4-3~deb9u1.
    
    For the testing distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed
    in version 3.1.4-3.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.1.4-3.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your spip packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"1","pct":55.56,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":33.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":11.11,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.