Debian: DSA-3894-1: graphite2 security update

    Date22 Jun 2017
    CategoryDebian
    79
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in the Graphite font rendering engine which might result in denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code if a malformed font file is processed.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA256
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3894-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    June 22, 2017                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : graphite2
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-7771 CVE-2017-7772 CVE-2017-7773 CVE-2017-7774 
                     CVE-2017-7775 CVE-2017-7776 CVE-2017-7777 CVE-2017-7778
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in the Graphite font rendering
    engine which might result in denial of service or the execution of
    arbitrary code if a malformed font file is processed.
    		       
    For the oldstable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed
    in version 1.3.10-1~deb8u1.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed
    prior to the initial release.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your graphite2 packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":14.29,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.