Debian: DSA-3893-1: jython security update

    Date22 Jun 2017
    CategoryDebian
    52
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Alvaro Munoz and Christian Schneider discovered that jython, an implementation of the Python language seamlessly integrated with Java, is prone to arbitrary code execution triggered when sending a serialized function to the deserializer.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3893-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    June 22, 2017                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : jython
    CVE ID         : CVE-2016-4000
    Debian Bug     : 864859
    
    Alvaro Munoz and Christian Schneider discovered that jython, an
    implementation of the Python language seamlessly integrated with Java,
    is prone to arbitrary code execution triggered when sending a serialized
    function to the deserializer.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed
    in version 2.5.3-3+deb8u1.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.5.3-16+deb9u1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.5.3-17.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your jython packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"1","pct":55.56,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":33.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":11.11,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.