Debian: DSA-3935-1: postgresql-9.4 security update

    Date 10 Aug 2017
    128
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Several vulnerabilities have been found in the PostgreSQL database system: CVE-2017-7546
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA256
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3935-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    August 10, 2017                       https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : postgresql-9.4
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-7546 CVE-2017-7547 CVE-2017-7548
    
    Several vulnerabilities have been found in the PostgreSQL database
    system:
    
    CVE-2017-7546
    
        In some authentication methods empty passwords were accepted.
    
    CVE-2017-7547
    
        User mappings could leak data to unprivileged users.
    
    CVE-2017-7548
    
        The lo_put() function ignored ACLs.
    
    For more in-depth descriptions of the security vulnerabilities,
    please see https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1772/
    
    For the oldstable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed
    in version 9.4.13-0+deb8u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your postgresql-9.4 packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"1","pct":20,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":11.43,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"24","type":"x","order":"3","pct":68.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Advisories

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.