Debian: DSA-3986-1: ghostscript security update

    Date29 Sep 2017
    CategoryDebian
    70
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Several vulnerabilities were discovered in Ghostscript, the GPL PostScript/PDF interpreter, which may result in denial of service if a specially crafted Postscript file is processed.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3986-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    September 29, 2017                    https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : ghostscript
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-9611 CVE-2017-9612 CVE-2017-9726 CVE-2017-9727
                     CVE-2017-9739 CVE-2017-9835 CVE-2017-11714
    Debian Bug     : 869907 869910 869913 869915 869916 869917 869977
    
    Several vulnerabilities were discovered in Ghostscript, the GPL
    PostScript/PDF interpreter, which may result in denial of service if a
    specially crafted Postscript file is processed.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed
    in version 9.06~dfsg-2+deb8u6.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 9.20~dfsg-3.2+deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your ghostscript packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"23","type":"x","order":"1","pct":56.1,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":12.2,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"3","pct":31.71,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.