Debian: DSA-3987-1: firefox-esr security update

    Date29 Sep 2017
    CategoryDebian
    258
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Several security issues have been found in the Mozilla Firefox web browser: Multiple memory safety errors, use-after-frees, buffer overflows and other implementation errors may lead to the execution of arbitrary code, denial of service, cross-site scripting or bypass of
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3987-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    September 29, 2017                    https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : firefox-esr
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-7793 CVE-2017-7805 CVE-2017-7810 CVE-2017-7814 
                     CVE-2017-7818 CVE-2017-7819 CVE-2017-7823 CVE-2017-7824
    
    Several security issues have been found in the Mozilla Firefox web
    browser: Multiple memory safety errors, use-after-frees, buffer
    overflows and other implementation errors may lead to the execution of
    arbitrary code, denial of service, cross-site scripting or bypass of
    the phishing and malware protection feature.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed
    in version 52.4.0esr-1~deb8u1.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 52.4.0esr-1~deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your firefox-esr packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"1","pct":52,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":16,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"3","pct":32,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.