Debian: DSA-4128-1: trafficserver security update

    Date02 Mar 2018
    CategoryDebian
    5711
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    Several vulnerabilities were discovered in Apache Traffic Server, a reverse and forward proxy server. They could lead to the use of an incorrect upstream proxy, or allow a remote attacker to cause a denial-of-service by application crash.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4128-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Sebastien Delafond
    March 02, 2018                        https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : trafficserver
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-5660 CVE-2017-7671
    
    Several vulnerabilities were discovered in Apache Traffic Server, a
    reverse and forward proxy server. They could lead to the use of an
    incorrect upstream proxy, or allow a remote attacker to cause a
    denial-of-service by application crash.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 7.0.0-6+deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your trafficserver packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of trafficserver please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/trafficserver
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.35,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.78,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.