Debian: DSA-4245-1: imagemagick security update

    Date14 Jul 2018
    CategoryDebian
    2178
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    This update fixes several vulnerabilities in Imagemagick, a graphical software suite. Various memory handling problems or incomplete input sanitising could result in denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4245-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    July 14, 2018                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : imagemagick
    CVE ID         : CVE-2018-5248 CVE-2018-11251 CVE-2018-12599 CVE-2018-12600
    
    This update fixes several vulnerabilities in Imagemagick, a graphical
    software suite. Various memory handling problems or incomplete input
    sanitising could result in denial of service or the execution of
    arbitrary code.
    	       
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-11+deb9u5.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your imagemagick packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of imagemagick please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/imagemagick
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"14","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.85,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":15.38,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"3","pct":30.77,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.