Debian: DSA-4247-1: ruby-rack-protection security update

    Date16 Jul 2018
    CategoryDebian
    1719
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    A timing attack was discovered in the function for CSRF token validation of the "Ruby rack protection" framework. For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4247-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    July 16, 2018                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : ruby-rack-protection
    CVE ID         : CVE-2018-1000119
    
    A timing attack was discovered in the function for CSRF token validation
    of the "Ruby rack protection" framework.											 
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.5.3-2+deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your ruby-rack-protection packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of ruby-rack-protection please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/ruby-rack-protection
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"1","pct":58.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":25,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":16.67,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.