Debian: DSA-4340-1: chromium-browser security update

    Date18 Nov 2018
    CategoryDebian
    6792
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    An out-of-bounds bounds memory access issue was discovered in chromium's v8 javascript library by cloudfuzzer. This update also fixes two problems introduced by the previous security
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4340-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                          Michael Gilbert
    November 18, 2018                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : chromium-browser
    CVE ID         : CVE-2018-17478
    
    An out-of-bounds bounds memory access issue was discovered in chromium's
    v8 javascript library by cloudfuzzer.
    
    This update also fixes two problems introduced by the previous security
    upload.  Support for arm64 has been restored and gconf-service is no longer
    a package dependency.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 70.0.3538.102-1~deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your chromium-browser packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of chromium-browser please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/chromium-browser
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":14.29,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.