Debian: DSA-4339-1: ceph security update

    Date13 Nov 2018
    CategoryDebian
    7561
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    Multiple vulnerabilities were discovered in Ceph, a distributed storage and file system: The cephx authentication protocol was suspectible to replay attacks and calculated signatures incorrectly, "ceph mon" did not validate capabilities for pool operations (resulting in potential
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4339-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    November 13, 2018                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : ceph
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-7519 CVE-2018-1086 CVE-2018-1128 CVE-2018-1129
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities were discovered in Ceph, a distributed storage
    and file system: The cephx authentication protocol was suspectible to
    replay attacks and calculated signatures incorrectly, "ceph mon" did not
    validate capabilities for pool operations (resulting in potential
    corruption or deletion of snapshot images) and a format string
    vulnerability in libradosstriper could result in denial of service.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 10.2.11-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your ceph packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of ceph please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/ceph
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"1","pct":55.56,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":33.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":11.11,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.