Debian: DSA-4346-2: ghostscript regression update

    Date23 Dec 2018
    CategoryDebian
    6529
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    The update for ghostscript issued as DSA-4346-1 caused a regression when used with certain options (cf. Debian bug #915832). Updated packages are now available to correct this issue.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4346-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    December 23, 2018                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : ghostscript
    Debian Bug     : 915832
    
    The update for ghostscript issued as DSA-4346-1 caused a regression when
    used with certain options (cf. Debian bug #915832). Updated packages are
    now available to correct this issue.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 9.26~dfsg-0+deb9u2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your ghostscript packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of ghostscript please refer to its
    security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/ghostscript
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"24","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.55,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":11.36,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.09,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.