Debian: DSA-4355-1: openssl1.0 security update

    Date19 Dec 2018
    CategoryDebian
    5372
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    Several local side channel attacks and a denial of service via large Diffie-Hellman parameters were discovered in OpenSSL, a Secure Sockets Layer toolkit.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4355-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    December 19, 2018                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : openssl1.0
    CVE ID         : CVE-2018-0732 CVE-2018-0734 CVE-2018-0737 CVE-2018-5407
    
    Several local side channel attacks and a denial of service via large
    Diffie-Hellman parameters were discovered in OpenSSL, a Secure Sockets
    Layer toolkit.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.0.2q-1~deb9u1. Going forward, openssl1.0 security updates for
    stretch will be based on the 1.0.2x upstream releases.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your openssl1.0 packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of openssl1.0 please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/openssl1.0
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"65","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.52,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.27,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.2,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.