Debian: DSA-4440-1: bind9 security update

    Date09 May 2019
    CategoryDebian
    5192
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple vulnerabilities were found in the BIND DNS server: CVE-2018-5743
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4440-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    May 09, 2019                          https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : bind9
    CVE ID         : CVE-2018-5743 CVE-2018-5745 CVE-2019-6465
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities were found in the BIND DNS server:
    
    CVE-2018-5743
    
        Connection limits were incorrectly enforced.
    
    CVE-2018-5745
    
        The "managed-keys" feature was susceptible to denial of service by
        triggering an assert.
    
    CVE-2019-6465
    
        ACLs for zone transfers were incorrectly enforced for dynamically
        loadable zones (DLZs).
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u5.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your bind9 packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of bind9 please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/bind9
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"1","pct":55.56,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":33.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":11.11,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.