Debian: DSA-4447-2: intel-microcode security update

    Date 19 Jun 2019
    7532
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    DSA 4447-1 shipped updated CPU microcode for most types of Intel CPUs as mitigations for the MSBDS, MFBDS, MLPDS and MDSUM hardware vulnerabilities. This update provides additional support for some Sandybridge server
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4447-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    Jun 20, 2019                          https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : intel-microcode
    CVE ID         : CVE-2018-12126 CVE-2018-12127 CVE-2018-12130
                     CVE-2019-11091
    
    DSA 4447-1 shipped updated CPU microcode for most types of Intel CPUs as
    mitigations for the MSBDS, MFBDS, MLPDS and MDSUM hardware vulnerabilities.
    
    This update provides additional support for some Sandybridge server
    and Core-X CPUs which were not covered in the original May microcode
    release. For a list of specific CPU models now supported please refer
    to the entries listed under CPUID 206D6 and 206D7 at
    https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/corporate-information/SA00233-microcode-update-guidance_05132019.pdf
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 3.20190618.1~deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your intel-microcode packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of intel-microcode please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/intel-microcode
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"1","pct":42.86,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":28.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.