Debian: DSA-4468-1: php-horde-form security update

    Date21 Jun 2019
    CategoryDebian
    7632
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    A path traversal vulnerability due to an unsanitized POST parameter was discovered in php-horde-form, a package providing form rendering, validation, and other functionality for the Horde Application Framework. An attacker can take advantage of this flaw for remote code execution.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4468-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    June 21, 2019                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : php-horde-form
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-9858
    Debian Bug     : 930321
    
    A path traversal vulnerability due to an unsanitized POST parameter was
    discovered in php-horde-form, a package providing form rendering,
    validation, and other functionality for the Horde Application Framework.
    An attacker can take advantage of this flaw for remote code execution.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.0.15-1+deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your php-horde-form packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of php-horde-form please refer to its
    security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/php-horde-form
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"9","type":"x","order":"3","pct":32.14,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.