Debian: DSA-4491-1: proftpd-dfsg security update

    Date04 Aug 2019
    CategoryDebian
    3928
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Tobias Maedel discovered that the mod_copy module of ProFTPD, a FTP/SFTP/FTPS server, performed incomplete permission validation for the CPFR/CPTO commands.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4491-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    August 04, 2019                       https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : proftpd-dfsg
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-12815
    Debian Bug     : 932453
    
    Tobias Maedel discovered that the mod_copy module of ProFTPD, a
    FTP/SFTP/FTPS server, performed incomplete permission validation for
    the CPFR/CPTO commands.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed
    in version 1.3.5b-4+deb9u1.
    
    For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.3.6-4+deb10u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your proftpd-dfsg packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of proftpd-dfsg please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/proftpd-dfsg
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":55.56,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":11.11,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"3","pct":33.33,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.