Debian: DSA-4492-1: postgresql-9.6 security update

    Date08 Aug 2019
    CategoryDebian
    2871
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Debian Large
    A issue has been discovered in the PostgreSQL database system, which could result in privilege escalation. For additional information please refer to the upstream announcement at
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4492-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    	
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    August 08, 2019                       https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : postgresql-9.6
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-10208
    
    A issue has been discovered in the PostgreSQL database system, which
    could result in privilege escalation.
    
    For additional information please refer to the upstream announcement at
    https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1960/
    
    For the oldstable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed
    in version 9.6.15-0+deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your postgresql-9.6 packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of postgresql-9.6 please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/postgresql-9.6
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"37","type":"x","order":"1","pct":51.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"10","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.89,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.72,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.