Debian: DSA-4511-1: nghttp2 security update

    Date01 Sep 2019
    CategoryDebian
    2739
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Debian Large
    Two vulnerabilities were discovered in the HTTP/2 code of the nghttp2 HTTP server, which could result in denial of service. For the oldstable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4511-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    	
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    September 01, 2019                    https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : nghttp2
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-9511 CVE-2019-9513
    
    Two vulnerabilities were discovered in the HTTP/2 code of the nghttp2
    HTTP server, which could result in denial of service.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed
    in version 1.18.1-1+deb9u1.
    
    For the stable distribution (buster), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.36.0-2+deb10u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your nghttp2 packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of nghttp2 please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/nghttp2
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"37","type":"x","order":"1","pct":51.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"10","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.89,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.72,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.