Debian: DSA-4517-1: exim4 security update

    Date06 Sep 2019
    CategoryDebian
    816
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    "Zerons" and Qualys discovered that a buffer overflow triggerable in the TLS negotiation code of the Exim mail transport agent could result in the execution of arbitrary code with root privileges.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4517-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    September 06, 2019                    https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : exim4
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-15846
    
    "Zerons" and Qualys discovered that a buffer overflow triggerable in the
    TLS negotiation code of the Exim mail transport agent could result in the
    execution of arbitrary code with root privileges.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed
    in version 4.89-2+deb9u6.
    
    For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in
    version 4.92-8+deb10u2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your exim4 packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of exim4 please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/exim4
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.17,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":16.67,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.17,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.