Debian: DSA-4615-1: spamassassin security update

    Date 01 Feb 2020
    638
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Two vulnerabilities were discovered in spamassassin, a Perl-based spam filter using text analysis. Malicious rule or configuration files, possibly downloaded from an updates server, could execute arbitrary commands under multiple scenarios.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4615-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    February 01, 2020                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : spamassassin
    CVE ID         : CVE-2020-1930 CVE-2020-1931
    Debian Bug     : 950258
    
    Two vulnerabilities were discovered in spamassassin, a Perl-based spam
    filter using text analysis. Malicious rule or configuration files,
    possibly downloaded from an updates server, could execute arbitrary
    commands under multiple scenarios.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed
    in version 3.4.2-1~deb9u3.
    
    For the stable distribution (buster), these problems have been fixed in
    version 3.4.2-1+deb10u2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your spamassassin packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of spamassassin please refer to its
    security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/spamassassin
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"1","pct":42.86,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":28.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.