Debian: New backup-manager package fixes several vulnerabilities

    Date 26 Aug 2005
    6549
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Updated package.
    - --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA 787-1                     This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                             Martin Schulze
    August 26th, 2005                       https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : backup manager
    Vulnerability  : insecure permissions and tempfile
    Problem-Type   : local
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CAN-2005-1855 CAN-2005-1856
    Debian Bug     : 308897 315582
    
    Two bugs have been found in backup-manager, a command-line driven
    backup utility.  The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project
    identifies the following problems:
    
    CAN-2005-1855
    
        Jeroen Vermeulen discovered that backup files are created with
        default permissions making them world readable, even though they
        may contain sensitive information.
    
    CAN-2005-1856
    
        Sven Joachim discovered that the optional CD-burning feature of
        backup-manager uses a hardcoded filename in a world-writable
        directory for logging.  This can be subject to a symlink attack.
    
    The old stable distribution (woody) does not provide the
    backup-manager package.
    
    For the stable distribution (sarge) these problems have been fixed in
    version 0.5.7-1sarge1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid) these problems have been fixed in
    version 0.5.8-2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your backup-manager package.
    
    
    Upgrade Instructions
    - --------------------
    
    wget url
            will fetch the file for you
    dpkg -i file.deb
            will install the referenced file.
    
    If you are using the apt-get package manager, use the line for
    sources.list as given below:
    
    apt-get update
            will update the internal database
    apt-get upgrade
            will install corrected packages
    
    You may use an automated update by adding the resources from the
    footer to the proper configuration.
    
    
    Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 alias sarge
    - --------------------------------
    
      Source archives:
    
        https://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/b/backup-manager/backup-manager_0.5.7-1sarge1.dsc
          Size/MD5 checksum:      631 6b20ee3cd0439df2e95819d5001f7e53
        https://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/b/backup-manager/backup-manager_0.5.7-1sarge1.diff.gz
          Size/MD5 checksum:    17938 a6f1ae5f8555c17c9db3a0fc2ba9ec7a
        https://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/b/backup-manager/backup-manager_0.5.7.orig.tar.gz
          Size/MD5 checksum:    35661 a97a66d03c4a05072924998f48f7b5d6
    
      Architecture independent components:
    
        https://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/b/backup-manager/backup-manager_0.5.7-1sarge1_all.deb
          Size/MD5 checksum:    30550 3bbe99ebf51f69ca80a93e19a64880ac
    
    
      These files will probably be moved into the stable distribution on
      its next update.
    
    - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    For apt-get: deb https://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
    For dpkg-ftp: ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security dists/stable/updates/main
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"1","pct":20,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":11.43,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"24","type":"x","order":"3","pct":68.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Advisories

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.