Linux Security
    Linux Security
    Linux Security

    Debian: cacti fix regression DSA-1569-2

    Date
    4122
    Posted By
    It was discovered that Cacti, a systems and services monitoring frontend, performed insufficient input sanitising, leading to cross site scripting and SQL injection being possible.
    - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-1569-2                  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                          Thijs Kinkhorst
    May 06, 2008                          https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : cacti
    Vulnerability  : insufficient input sanitising
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE Id(s)      : CVE-2008-0783 CVE-2008-0785
    
    The original update for cacti unfortunately introduced a regression.
    Updated packages have been created to address this. For reference, the
    full advisory text is quoted below.
    
    It was discovered that Cacti, a systems and services monitoring frontend,
    performed insufficient input sanitising, leading to cross site scripting
    and SQL injection being possible.
    
    For the stable distribution (etch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.8.6i-3.4.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.8.7b-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your cacti package.
    
    Upgrade instructions
    - --------------------
    
    wget url
            will fetch the file for you
    dpkg -i file.deb
            will install the referenced file.
    
    If you are using the apt-get package manager, use the line for
    sources.list as given below:
    
    apt-get update
            will update the internal database
    apt-get upgrade
            will install corrected packages
    
    You may use an automated update by adding the resources from the
    footer to the proper configuration.
    
    
    Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 alias etch
    - -------------------------------
    
    Source archives:
    
      https://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/c/cacti/cacti_0.8.6i-3.4.dsc
        Size/MD5 checksum:      873 347b6ffce9bc1383dd5885ebc7a23743
      https://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/c/cacti/cacti_0.8.6i-3.4.diff.gz
        Size/MD5 checksum:    36755 4068c87a907a7b964b6d2bcdd1cca7c0
      https://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/c/cacti/cacti_0.8.6i.orig.tar.gz
        Size/MD5 checksum:  1122700 341b5828d95db91f81f5fbba65411d63
    
    Architecture independent packages:
    
      https://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/c/cacti/cacti_0.8.6i-3.4_all.deb
        Size/MD5 checksum:   959548 07354653cd9ee64f97149d0142dee156
    
    
      These files will probably be moved into the stable distribution on
      its next update.
    
    - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    For apt-get: deb https://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
    For dpkg-ftp: ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security dists/stable/updates/main
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    Advisories

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Tails is the most secure Linux distro out there.

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 2 answer(s).
    /main-polls/41-ubuntu-is-a-more-secure-distro-than-fedora?task=poll.vote&format=json
    41
    radio
    [{"id":"142","title":"Yes - Tails get my vote!","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"1","pct":80,"resources":[]},{"id":"143","title":"Nope - Parrot OS has surpassed Tails in its security and privacy.","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"2","pct":20,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350

    Please vote first in order to view vote results.


    VIEW MORE POLLS

    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.