Submit a story to LinuxSecurity!

Thanks very much for your interest in sharing your story with us. Our site is driven by users like you.

Post anonymously

Please also feel free to using our GPG key (found on our About page) or email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

    Back

    Debian: New fastjar packages fix directory traversal

    Date06 Sep 2006
    CategoryDebian
    3933
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    J 
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian Security Advisory DSA 1170-1 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze September 6th, 2006 http://www.debian.org/security/faq - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Package : gcc-3.4 Vulnerability : missing sanity check Problem type : local (remote) Debian-specific: no CVE ID : CVE-2006-3619 BugTraq ID : 15669 Debian Bug : 368397 J

    Related News

    Massachusetts: Tell Your Lawmakers to Press Pause on Government Face Surveillance
    Massachusetts: Tell Your Lawmakers to Press Pause on Government Face Surveillance
    New US Privacy Bill Would Intro Jail Time for CEOs
    New US Privacy Bill Would Intro Jail Time for CEOs
    Secret Court Rules That the FBI’s “Backdoor Searches” of Americans Violated the Fourth Amendment
    Secret Court Rules That the FBI’s “Backdoor Searches” of Americans Violated the Fourth Amendment
    Germany's cyber-security agency recommends Firefox as most secure browser
    Germany's cyber-security agency recommends Firefox as most secure browser
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.35,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.78,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    openSUSE: 2019:2347-1: moderate: lighttpd
    Date20 Oct 2019 @ 16:14
    openSUSE: 2019:2348-1: important: tcpdump
    Date20 Oct 2019 @ 16:13
    openSUSE: 2019:2343-1: important: libpcap
    Date20 Oct 2019 @ 16:12
    openSUSE: 2019:2345-1: important: libpcap
    Date20 Oct 2019 @ 16:12

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy. 

    Learn More