Debian: New tdiary packages fix Cross Site Request Forgery

    Date12 Sep 2005
    CategoryDebian
    6871
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Updated package.
    - --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA 808-1                     This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                             Martin Schulze
    September 12th, 2005                    http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : tdiary
    Vulnerability  : design error
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CAN-2005-2411
    
    The tdiary Development Team has discovered a Cross-Site Request
    Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in tdiary, a new generation weblog that
    can be exploited by remote attackers to alter the users information.
    
    The old stable distribution (woody) does not contain tdiary packages.
    
    For the stable distribution (sarge) this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.0.1-1sarge1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid) this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.0.2-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your tdiary packages.
    
    
    Upgrade Instructions
    - --------------------
    
    wget url
            will fetch the file for you
    dpkg -i file.deb
            will install the referenced file.
    
    If you are using the apt-get package manager, use the line for
    sources.list as given below:
    
    apt-get update
            will update the internal database
    apt-get upgrade
            will install corrected packages
    
    You may use an automated update by adding the resources from the
    footer to the proper configuration.
    
    
    Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 alias sarge
    - --------------------------------
    
      Source archives:
    
        http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/t/tdiary/tdiary_2.0.1-1sarge1.dsc
          Size/MD5 checksum:      698 725575945a14b3ff9ff776e4254b6e54
        http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/t/tdiary/tdiary_2.0.1-1sarge1.diff.gz
          Size/MD5 checksum:    24611 df8afbbc86e0f1a9f365a1b8271e7a12
        http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/t/tdiary/tdiary_2.0.1.orig.tar.gz
          Size/MD5 checksum:  1840990 eaec0d3c00e1605d5cefad4119718183
    
      Architecture independent components:
    
        http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/t/tdiary/tdiary-contrib_2.0.1-1sarge1_all.deb
          Size/MD5 checksum:   109264 b3de14edff72c292002d68b4f6c5234c
        http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/t/tdiary/tdiary-mode_2.0.1-1sarge1_all.deb
          Size/MD5 checksum:    27768 632e5ed6bb82fce0d1f787aea0b25cf4
        http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/t/tdiary/tdiary-plugin_2.0.1-1sarge1_all.deb
          Size/MD5 checksum:   155066 6100fce2dbe0a8acc5a365766b2b8b84
        http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/t/tdiary/tdiary-theme_2.0.1-1sarge1_all.deb
          Size/MD5 checksum:  1506732 6a77d569ef301bc299ee4fe8e4f929f5
        http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/t/tdiary/tdiary_2.0.1-1sarge1_all.deb
          Size/MD5 checksum:   171434 b31846dc0632acdb13787a5ec28e8bc5
    
    
      These files will probably be moved into the stable distribution on
      its next update.
    
    - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    For apt-get: deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
    For dpkg-ftp: ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security dists/stable/updates/main
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"40","type":"x","order":"1","pct":48.78,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"2","pct":15.85,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"29","type":"x","order":"3","pct":35.37,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.