Debian: New trac packages fix cross-site request forgery

    Date 13 Nov 2006
    2486
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Updated package.
    - --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA 1209-2                    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                         Moritz Muehlenhoff
    November 12th, 2006                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : trac
    Vulnerability  : cross-site request forgery
    Problem-Type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    
    The Trac update in DSA 1209 introduced a regression. This update corrects
    this flaw. For completeness, the original advisory text below:
     
    It was discovered that Trac, a wiki and issue tracking system for
    software development projects, performs insufficient validation against
    cross-site request forgery, which might lead to an attacker being able
    to perform manipulation of a Trac site with the privileges of the
    attacked Trac user.
    
    For the stable distribution (sarge) this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.8.1-3sarge6.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid) this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.10.1-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your trac package.
    
    
    Upgrade Instructions
    - --------------------
    
    wget url
            will fetch the file for you
    dpkg -i file.deb
            will install the referenced file.
    
    If you are using the apt-get package manager, use the line for
    sources.list as given below:
    
    apt-get update
            will update the internal database
    apt-get upgrade
            will install corrected packages
    
    You may use an automated update by adding the resources from the
    footer to the proper configuration.
    
    
    Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 alias sarge
    - --------------------------------
    
      Source archives:
    
        https://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/t/trac/trac_0.8.1-3sarge7.dsc
          Size/MD5 checksum:      656 3e2a71eb01a324d3a26f9e6c001fbba5
        https://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/t/trac/trac_0.8.1-3sarge7.diff.gz
          Size/MD5 checksum:    14842 9cdb9eed54faecbe2c4df8f5106dafdb
        https://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/t/trac/trac_0.8.1.orig.tar.gz
          Size/MD5 checksum:   236791 1b6c44fae90c760074762b73cdc88c8d
    
      Architecture independent components:
    
        https://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/t/trac/trac_0.8.1-3sarge7_all.deb
          Size/MD5 checksum:   200092 5c0659ad7e99970da829c0258209b747
    
      These files will probably be moved into the stable distribution on
      its next update.
    
    - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    For apt-get: deb https://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
    For dpkg-ftp: ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security dists/stable/updates/main
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"1","pct":20,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":11.43,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"24","type":"x","order":"3","pct":68.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Advisories

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.