Fedora Core 3 Update: pcmcia-cs-3.2.7-2.2

    Date21 Feb 2005
    CategoryFedora
    6702
    Posted ByJoe Shakespeare
    Updated package.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Fedora Update Notification
    FEDORA-2005-156
    2005-02-21
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Product     : Fedora Core 3
    Name        : pcmcia-cs
    Version     : 3.2.7
    Release     : 2.2
    Summary     : Utilities for handling PCMCIA devices
    Description :
    User-level daemon and utilities for using PCMCIA devices on Linux.
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    * Mon Feb 21 2005 Dave Jones 
    - Fix double fclose in parse_cis()  (#146113)
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    This update can be downloaded from:
    http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/3/
    
    2d0f6323f1b36acf5d4261ceece30876  SRPMS/pcmcia-cs-3.2.7-2.2.src.rpm
    52c2ab505398a3578c8ac9cab08c36f3  x86_64/pcmcia-cs-3.2.7-2.2.x86_64.rpm
    4a5ea87c3f92d63255382ed5b82b8a4c  x86_64/debug/pcmcia-cs-debuginfo-3.2.7-2.2.x86_64.rpm
    e65dea697557ca792ed512e9208ed81d  i386/pcmcia-cs-3.2.7-2.2.i386.rpm
    25baf7b5562daa1a46baeac5377e3ff2  i386/debug/pcmcia-cs-debuginfo-3.2.7-2.2.i386.rpm
    
    This update can also be installed with the Update Agent; you can
    launch the Update Agent with the 'up2date' command.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    --
    fedora-announce-list mailing list
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-announce-list
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"67","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.76,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":12.93,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"34","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.31,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.