Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 566
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 566

Gentoo: GLSA-201512-11 High: Firebird Buffer Overflow Threat

gentoo
Calendar Grey December 30, 2015
Dist Gentoo Esm H88
Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 202301-07 highlights a severe memory leak in PostgreSQL that could allow unauthorized access.
A buffer overflow in Firebird might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code.

Summary

The vulnerability is caused due to an error when processing requests from remote clients.

Resolution

All Firebird users should upgrade to the latest version: # emerge --sync # emerge --ask --oneshot -v ">=dev-db/firebird-2.5.3.26780.0-r3"
NOTE: Firebird package was moved to the testing branch (unstable) of Gentoo. There is currently no stable version of Firebird, and there will be no further GLSAs for this package.

References

[ 1 ] CVE-2013-2492 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2492

Availability

This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at the Gentoo Security Website: https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201512-11
style>.gentoo_availability{display:block;}

Concerns

Security is a primary focus of Gentoo Linux and ensuring the confidentiality and security of our users' machines is of utmost importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to security@gentoo.org or alternatively, you may file a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org.

Severity: High
Title: Firebird: Buffer Overflow
Date: December 30, 2015
Bugs: #460780
ID: 201512-11

Synopsis

A buffer overflow in Firebird might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code.

Background

Firebird is a multi-platform, open source relational database.

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Affected Packages

------------------------------------------------------------------- Package / Vulnerable / Unaffected ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 dev-db/firebird < 2.5.3.26780.0-r3 >= 2.5.3.26780.0-r3

Impact

===== A remote attacker could possibly execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the process, or cause a Denial of Service condition.

Workaround

There is no known workaround at this time.

Related News

Your message here