Gentoo: GLSA-201904-24: Ming: Multiple vulnerabilities

    Date24 Apr 2019
    CategoryGentoo
    1756
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in Ming, the worst of which could result in a Denial of Service condition.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Gentoo Linux Security Advisory                           GLSA 201904-24
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                                               https://security.gentoo.org/
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    
     Severity: Normal
        Title: Ming: Multiple vulnerabilities
         Date: April 24, 2019
         Bugs: #624712, #626498, #646770
           ID: 201904-24
    
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    
    Synopsis
    ========
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in Ming, the worst of which
    could result in a Denial of Service condition.
    
    Background
    ==========
    
    A library for generating Macromedia Flash files.
    
    Affected packages
    =================
    
        -------------------------------------------------------------------
         Package              /     Vulnerable     /            Unaffected
        -------------------------------------------------------------------
      1  media-libs/ming            < 0.20181112            >= 0.20181112 
    
    Description
    ===========
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Ming. Please review
    the CVE identifiers referenced below for details.
    
    Impact
    ======
    
    Please review the referenced CVE identifiers for details.
    
    Workaround
    ==========
    
    There is no known workaround at this time.
    
    Resolution
    ==========
    
    All Ming users should upgrade to the latest version:
    
      # emerge --sync
      # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=media-libs/ming-0.20181112"
    
    References
    ==========
    
    [  1 ] CVE-2017-11728
           https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-11728
    [  2 ] CVE-2017-11729
           https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-11729
    [  3 ] CVE-2017-11730
           https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-11730
    [  4 ] CVE-2017-11731
           https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-11731
    [  5 ] CVE-2017-11732
           https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-11732
    [  6 ] CVE-2017-11733
           https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-11733
    [  7 ] CVE-2017-11734
           https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-11734
    [  8 ] CVE-2017-9988
           https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9988
    [  9 ] CVE-2017-9989
           https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9989
    [ 10 ] CVE-2018-5251
           https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-5251
    [ 11 ] CVE-2018-5294
           https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-5294
    [ 12 ] CVE-2018-6315
           https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-6315
    [ 13 ] CVE-2018-6358
           https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-6358
    [ 14 ] CVE-2018-6359
           https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-6359
    
    Availability
    ============
    
    This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at
    the Gentoo Security Website:
    
     https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201904-24
    
    Concerns?
    =========
    
    Security is a primary focus of Gentoo Linux and ensuring the
    confidentiality and security of our users' machines is of utmost
    importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or alternatively, you may file a bug at
    https://bugs.gentoo.org.
    
    License
    =======
    
    Copyright 2019 Gentoo Foundation, Inc; referenced text
    belongs to its owner(s).
    
    The contents of this document are licensed under the
    Creative Commons - Attribution / Share Alike license.
    
    https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"64","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.46,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.