Gentoo: GLSA-201911-07: Mozilla Firefox: Multiple vulnerabilities

    Date24 Nov 2019
    CategoryGentoo
    667
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in Mozilla Firefox, the worst of which could result in the arbitrary execution of code.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Gentoo Linux Security Advisory                           GLSA 201911-07
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                                               https://security.gentoo.org/
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    
     Severity: Normal
        Title: Mozilla Firefox: Multiple vulnerabilities
         Date: November 25, 2019
         Bugs: #693442, #698512
           ID: 201911-07
    
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    
    Synopsis
    ========
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in Mozilla Firefox, the worst
    of which could result in the arbitrary execution of code.
    
    Background
    ==========
    
    Mozilla Firefox is a popular open-source web browser from the Mozilla
    Project.
    
    Affected packages
    =================
    
        -------------------------------------------------------------------
         Package              /     Vulnerable     /            Unaffected
        -------------------------------------------------------------------
      1  www-client/firefox           < 68.2.0                  >= 68.2.0 
      2  www-client/firefox-bin       < 68.2.0                  >= 68.2.0 
        -------------------------------------------------------------------
         2 affected packages
    
    Description
    ===========
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Mozilla Firefox.
    Please review the CVE identifiers referenced below for details.
    
    Impact
    ======
    
    Please review the referenced CVE identifiers for details.
    
    Workaround
    ==========
    
    There is no known workaround at this time.
    
    Resolution
    ==========
    
    All Firefox users should upgrade to the latest version:
    
      # emerge --sync
      # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=www-client/firefox-68.2.0"
    
    All Firefox binary users should upgrade to the latest version:
    
      # emerge --sync
      # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=www-client/firefox-bin-68.2.0"
    
    References
    ==========
    
    [ 1 ] CVE-2019-11740
          https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-11740
    [ 2 ] CVE-2019-11742
          https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-11742
    [ 3 ] CVE-2019-11743
          https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-11743
    [ 4 ] CVE-2019-11744
          https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-11744
    [ 5 ] CVE-2019-11746
          https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-11746
    [ 6 ] CVE-2019-11752
          https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-11752
    [ 7 ] CVE-2019-9812
          https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-9812
    
    Availability
    ============
    
    This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at
    the Gentoo Security Website:
    
     https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201911-07
    
    Concerns?
    =========
    
    Security is a primary focus of Gentoo Linux and ensuring the
    confidentiality and security of our users' machines is of utmost
    importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or alternatively, you may file a bug at
    https://bugs.gentoo.org.
    
    License
    =======
    
    Copyright 2019 Gentoo Foundation, Inc; referenced text
    belongs to its owner(s).
    
    The contents of this document are licensed under the
    Creative Commons - Attribution / Share Alike license.
    
    https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5
    
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"65","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.52,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.27,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.2,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.