Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 681
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 681

Gentoo: GLSA-202003-19 High: PPP Buffer Overflow Risk Appeal

gentoo
Calendar Grey March 15, 2020
Dist Gentoo Esm H88
The Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 202003-19 highlights critical security vulnerabilities, especially PP buffer overflows, urging users to update affected packages immediately
A buffer overflow in PPP might allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code.

Summary

It was discovered that bounds check in PPP for the rhostname was improperly constructed in the EAP request and response functions.

Resolution

All PPP users should upgrade to the latest version: # emerge --sync # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=net-dialup/ppp-2.4.8"

References

[ 1 ] CVE-2020-8597 https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-8597

Availability

This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at the Gentoo Security Website: https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202003-19
style>.gentoo_availability{display:block;}

Concerns

Security is a primary focus of Gentoo Linux and ensuring the confidentiality and security of our users' machines is of utmost importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to security@gentoo.org or alternatively, you may file a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org.

Severity: High
Title: PPP: Buffer overflow
Date: March 15, 2020
Bugs: #710308
ID: 202003-19

Synopsis

A buffer overflow in PPP might allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code.

Background

PPP is a Unix implementation of the Point-to-Point Protocol.

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Affected Packages

------------------------------------------------------------------- Package / Vulnerable / Unaffected ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 net-dialup/ppp < 2.4.8 >= 2.4.8

Impact

===== A remote attacker, by sending specially crafted authentication data, could possibly execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the process or cause a Denial of Service condition.

Workaround

There is no known workaround at this time.

Related News

Your message here